Rural Development Councils: Preliminary Findings and Conclusions

View this Publication

Report reflects the experience of the eight Rural Development Councils initiated as part of the Federal Rural Initiative that provides a baseline of information on the organization and early development of the effort.

In January 1990, President Bush announced the steps his administration would take “to strengthen the delivery of Federal support for rural development.” The administration gave thenSecretary of Agriculture Clayton Yeutter instructions “to implement six proposals designed to improve the coordination of rural development programs and serve as a catalyst for future initiatives.”

The six elements included the creation of a President’s Council on Rural America; establishment of a Working Group on Rural Development as a subgroup of the White House Economic Policy Council; creation of a Rural Development Technical Assistance Center and Hot Line; a rural development demonstration program; and an effort to target rural development programs on specific activities. In addition to these federal-level activities, the Initiative also envisioned the creation of state-level rural development councils that would coordinate rural development efforts among federal departments and agencies and establish collaborative relationships with states, local governments, and the private sector.

By the end of 1990, Rural Development Councils were established in eight states: Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas and Washington. Each of the Councils was initially organized by the state Farmers Home Administration director and included a variety of federal officials as well as individuals from various segments of each of the states.

At the same time, a management group (known as the Monday Management Group — MMG) was established, made up of representatives from the participating federal departments. The MMG focused on outcome monitoring, served as a conduit for federal officials who would act as liaisons with the states, worked with the National Governors’ Association, and provided a link with the Working Group on Rural Development.

Early in 1991 it became clear that the activity that was taking place in the eight states provided an important source of information for those interested in the role of states in rural development. Upon the advice of the State Policy Program of the Aspen Institute, the Ford Foundation provided a grant to support a data collection activity in each of the states, documenting the baseline process for the formation of the Councils. The grant was linked to on-going evaluation activities of the Aspen State Policy Program undertaken by a team operating out of the Washington Public Affairs Center of the University of Southern California’s School of Public Administration. A monitoring team of eight academics was assembled, five of whom resided in the relevant state and three travelled to the state. This paper represents a preliminary report of the activities of the Councils from November through July of 1991.

Aspen Institute Community Strategies Group
Latest From Aspen CSG
Steps Towards Equity: Voices from the USDA Equity Commission

Aspen CSG's analysis of the USDA Equity Commission's final report, plus quotes and insights from rural development leaders appointed to the commission.

Community Foundation Approaches to Housing Impact Investing

Apr. 29th, 2024, 2PM

Come share and learn how community foundations are finding innovative ways to use investment portfolios to partner with local developers & increase housing stock.

Case Study
Communities Need Safe Drinking Water: A Rural Environmental Justice Case Study

This short case study has insights on what will it take for rural communities to drive their own clean water solutions and breaks down the structural challenges that keep rural communities from accessing clean water solutions.

Agricultural fields at sunrise
Funders Shift Thinking to Meet Community Needs

Apr. 11th, 2024, 2PM

Fair treatment and meaningful involvement require agencies and funders to shift gears and meet communities where they are. What does it take to make this shift so that communities are treated fairly and meaningfully involved in the funding process?

Do New FEMA Rule Changes Align with Equity Principles?

FEMA announced big changes to federal disaster assistance programs. Do these changes create more equitable outcomes for communities after natural disasters?

Broadband technician working
Broadband Resources

A collection of broadband resources for funding, advocacy, and community program opportunities for rural community leaders.