NEW FACTORY WORKERS IN OLD FARMING COMMUNITIES: Costs and Consequences of Relocating Meat Industries

This document is a collection of papers from an April 1992 conference on “New Factory Workers in Old Farming Communities: Costs and Consequences of Relocating Meat Industries.” The conference was sponsored by the University of Kansas and co-sponsored by other universities, with funding from The Ford Foundation in cooperation with The Aspen Institute’s Rural Economic Policy Program. The document discusses the restructuring and globalization of the U.S. meat, poultry, and fish-processing industries, focusing on the shift of production from urban to rural areas and the emergence of large, vertically integrated firms. Key themes include:

  • Industry Concentration: The rise of powerful oligopolies like Tyson, ConAgra, Cargill (Excel), and IBP, which control significant market shares across different meat and food sectors. These firms have achieved dominance through acquisitions and vertical integration, from input supply to processing and distribution.
  • Technological Innovations: The adoption of cost-cutting innovations such as the disassembly line, larger processing plants, and automation, which reduced the need for skilled labor and increased productivity.
  • Labor and Social Consequences: The impact on workers, including declining wages (especially in meatpacking), hazardous working conditions, and high turnover. The document notes that companies often recruit from outside the local region, leading to an influx of “new immigrants” (Hispanics and African Americans) into rural communities.
  • Rural Industrialization: The strategic relocation of processing plants to rural areas, often close to raw materials, to take advantage of lower labor costs and local government incentives (tax breaks, infrastructure improvements).
  • Environmental and Community Impact: Concerns raised by various groups, including environmentalists (manure, chemical use, water quality), animal welfare advocates (treatment of confined animals), and rural development advocates (limited economic benefits to local communities as profits are extracted by external corporations).
  • Globalization: The expansion of these concentrated food firms into international markets, transferring technology and production methods to countries with cheaper labor (e.g., Thailand for poultry).

The document highlights how the drive for lower costs and increased control by transnational corporations has transformed the food system, creating a complex interplay of economic, social, and environmental consequences that challenge traditional regulatory frameworks and local community well-being.

Aspen Institute Community Strategies Group
Latest From Aspen CSG
Blog
Green landscape with icons and designs over it
Building Capacity in Rural & Indigenous Communities

Insights and learnings from rural practitioners on how organizational capacity and technical assistance can be carefully and intentionally strengthened to grow economies, health, and livelihoods for each and every person in their regions.

Blog
Volunteer places a 'Vote Here' sign outside a rural community center before polls open.
A Reminder To Reporters: If You’ve Seen One Rural Place … You’ve Seen One Rural Place

By shaping accurate narratives, we can drive fair and just investments and policies that honor the people and places at the heart of rural and Indigenous communities.

Tool
Measuring community capacity building book cover
Measuring Community Capacity Building Workbook

This is a workbook focuses on improving the ability of individuals, organizations, businesses, and government in their community to come together, learn, make well-reasoned decisions about the community’s present and future, and work together to carry out those decisions.

Blog
Ten Books for Rethinking Rural and Indigenous Development

Stories shape how we understand people and places. This list highlights narratives and research on the systemic forces affecting rural and Indigenous communities.

Blog
How Rural Development Hubs Can Strengthen Rural Health Transformation Program Implementation

Rural Development Hub leaders say new funding like RHTP works best when regions interpret it against existing priorities, coordinate it through existing partnerships, and adapt it to local context — rather than treating it as a distinct program.

Blog
Ten Podcasts Focused on Rural Community and Economic Development

Check out our roundup of podcasts highlighting important issues about and to rural communities and Native nations.