View this Publication
This report, titled “From Keeping Time to Keeping Pace: The Swiss Watch Industry and the Future of the Jura Watch Region” by Amy Glasmeier and Bettina Brunner, analyzes the decline of the Swiss watch industry and the Jura region’s economy, offering lessons for regional economic development and technological innovation. The paper argues that the Jura’s historic dominance in watchmaking, which began over 200 years ago, ended in the 1970s due to foreign competition and a shift from mechanical to electronic watch movements. This led to massive job losses and outmigration. While the Swiss watch industry still leads in export value, its output is a fraction of what it once was, and resources for R&D are scarce. Several factors contributed to this decline:
- Cartelization: From the 1930s to the 1970s, protectionist measures, including cartelization, hobbled the Swiss watch industry by discouraging technological uptake and innovation.
- Technological Paradigm Shift: The advent of quartz technology and vertical integration strategies by competitors (Japan and Hong Kong) rendered the Swiss’s established mechanical watch production system obsolete. The Swiss were slow to adapt, clinging to their traditional methods and failing to commercialize their own electronic watch inventions.
- Organizational Rigidities: The fragmented production structure, long manufacturing cycles for mechanical watches, and the inability of major movement producers like ASUAG to adapt to new technologies or market their products internationally hampered a swift response.
- Distribution System: The traditional Swiss distribution system, focused on jewelry stores and mechanical watch repair, was ill-equipped to handle the cheaper, more accurate, and less repair-intensive quartz watches.
- Lack of Services and Innovation: The Jura region suffered from a lack of a strong service sector, limited technology transfer among firms, and an inability of many family-run businesses to innovate beyond established products.
The paper also examines regional policy responses in the Jura, including federal programs like LIM (aid to mountain regions) and Arrete Bonny (aid to endangered economies), and cantonal initiatives in Neuchatel and Jura. While these programs aimed to promote diversification and support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), their success has been limited. The authors critique the overreliance on SMEs, arguing that they are not inherently more innovative or job-generating than larger firms and often lack the resources for significant R&D and market penetration. Industrial recruitment of branch plants is presented as an alternative, but these often bring jobs for semi-skilled labor and may not foster local linkages or technology transfer.In conclusion, the document emphasizes that the Swiss experience highlights the challenges regions face during radical technological change, particularly when entrenched industrial structures, institutional inertia, and a focus on past successes prevent adaptation and innovation.
